◐Partially reproducedResults, Alarm pheromone-responsive glomeruli are spatially stereotyped, paragraph 2; Figure 5C; Figure S6rests on an assumption
PGb, PGa and 6G each respond to a unique combination of pheromones, with several pheromone and glomerulus pairs giving no response; PGb responds to 4-methyl-3-heptanone, 4-methyl-3-heptanol and 4-methyl-3-hexanol and not to 6MHO, PGa to 4-methyl-3-heptanol and 4-methyl-3-hexanol, and 6G to 6MHO.
while PG b , PG a , and 6G are spatially adjacent, they each reliably respond to unique combinations of odorants, with several pheromone/glomerulus combinations producing no detectable responses ... PG b did not respond to 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one
Results, Alarm pheromone-responsive glomeruli are spatially stereotyped, paragraph 2; Figure 5C; Figure S6
With the disc, PGb responds at 48% to heptanone, heptanol and hexanol under both identifications, both plane readings and both models (plane a, model a: bix 0.851, 0.678, 0.734 with 5 ants; aiiy 0.596, 0.327, 0.528 with 12 ants), all with CIs above 0, and 6G responds to 6MHO (0.335 with 2 ants, 0.280 with 10). PGa is not identified under bix; under aiiy (4 ants) it responds to heptanol (0.258 to 0.274) and its hexanol prediction is 0.164 to 0.191 with the CI above 0, short of 0.2, so 5 of the 6 named combinations respond. PGb's prediction for 6MHO is negative with its CI below 0 (-0.087, -0.084), which the criterion counts as neither a response nor no response. The sets of PGb, PGa and 6G differ under the disc. With the region ROI, which takes in neighbours within 17.5 um, PGb responds to 6MHO in some fits and under aiiy the sets differ in one of four fits. No reading meets the whole criterion; the PGb and 6G parts hold. For the region ROI, 618 of the 1,684 traces had no disc pixel of at least 0.2 and fell back to the disc, which narrows the difference between the two ROIs.
How the test differed from the paper’s method
- The single-glomerulus traces are computed for two identifications, bix (the adopted M2 reading) and aiiy (the reading that identifies PGa in the most ants, chosen in the notebook by that rule), for both plane readings and both of the claims file's ROIs (the 15 um disc and the region of at least 0.2 at the centre). aiiy uses the ROI's maximum and drawing a, the reading set aside for the counts of figs5a-sparse-median-6, and 356 of drawing a's 436 regions are under 10 um across; it is used only because it finds PGa in the most ants, and the PGa results rest on it.
- The outcome rests on the disc ROI (the claims file's first M3 ROI and the typical glomerulus of Figure 5D), adopted as an assumption: the region of at least 0.2 is chosen on the same trial's peak map and absorbs neighbouring glomeruli.
- Each plane's row band is stabilized (phase correlation against the baseline mean, as for the maps); the unstabilized disc trace is kept for comparison (PGb peak fold change, median absolute difference 0.035, largest 0.591, r = 0.98; 3 of 129 trials change side of 0.2). Volume times include the centre plane's offset in the volume scan (0.0335 s per plane, from the files' starting_time).
- The model of reading (a) predicts for the average ant (sum-coded ant effects).